Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Sheikh Hasina in 2024
Sheikh Hasina

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.

Structure

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. Eight days of current nominations are maintained – older days are archived.

To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


November 24

[edit]

RD/blurb H. Rap Brown

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: H. Rap Brown (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  American civil rights activist H. Rap Brown, who served as chairman of the SNCC and advocated for Black Power, dies at the age of 82. (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Ainty Painty (talk) 07:09, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 23

[edit]

RD: Udo Kier

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Udo Kier (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Dunn, Jack (24 November 2025). "Udo Kier, German Actor Who Appeared in 'My Own Private Idaho,' 'Andy Warhol's Frankenstein,' Dies at 81". Variety. Retrieved 24 November 2025.
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Sheev (talk)

November 2025 Israeli attack in Beirut

[edit]
Article: November 2025 Israeli attack in Beirut (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Israeli airstrike on Beirut, Lebanon, kills five Hezbollah members, including Haytham Ali Tabatabai. (Post)
News source(s): AP, L'Orient Today, Haaretz
Credits:

 ArionStar (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Skye Gyngell

[edit]
Article: Skye Gyngell (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australian chef, death announced on 23rd a day after death (22nd). Abcmaxx (talk) 00:15, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UN Climate Change Conference (COP30)

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 United Nations Climate Change Conference (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The annual UN Climate Change Conference (COP30) (pictured) concludes with a weak agreement on further measures to mitigate climate change. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The annual UN Climate Change Conference (COP30) (pictured) concludes with an agreement on further measures to mitigate climate change.
News source(s): Al Jazeera, France24, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Climate change is a significant factor in many of the disasters that we report and so this annual tussle should be part of our coverage too. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:53, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support This conference received a lot of news coverage, and the agreement has generally be seen as a small step forward following the past couple years of conferences being captured by big oil. I'd be concerned about calling the agreement "weak" in wikivoice, but this wording seems to be backed up enough by expert consensus that I'd be happy to leave it in (although perhaps an ALT would be wise to include). --Grnrchst (talk) 12:27, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Unless the conclusion is something of the scale of the Paris Agreement, we typically do not post these types of international meetings. That we have to call the agreement here "weak" is not helpful to demonstrate why this is important. If anything the most significant news is the purposeful lack from the US to be involved and even that itself is not reason to post. Masem (t) 13:02, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This is ITN where other candidate topics include the sale of a comic book, a beauty contest, a bus accident, a motorcycle race and lots of football games. Just about any environmental issue is more important than these. The US angle is significant as it has affected the pace of progress while the independent initiative of California is interesting too. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:19, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose Every year politicians from all over the globe fly in on private jets to either a fossil-fuelled dictatorship, flood-prone region, concrete metropolis, or in this case, a deforested area, make bold statements and promises, only to go back to sponsoring fossil fuels, wars, logging industries, mass-produced low quality plastics in coal-powered factories and energy-guzzling data-centres. Then repeat the whole charade each year while the climate continues to deteriorate. If they really cared about the environment they would have backed it up with actions, even small ones such as holding this meeting on Zoom, because the only thing this meeting has so far done is raised the carbon footprint. Abcmaxx (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose even the article mentioned that the outcome of this conference was "weak" at best since it's the usual carrot on stick promise that was being made instead of observable progess. NotKringe (talk) 14:22, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb Many of the oppose rationale seem to have an implicit premise that ITN should functionally become "Current events Wikipedians think are most important". That is, in fact, not what this section is for: ITN means "in the news". Meaningless sham elections and performative global conferences can, and regularly do, garner substantive worldwide news coverage, even while that coverage is critical or skeptical. "I acknowledge this event is getting worldwide coverage across all of the reliable sources, but I personally think that this event was meaningless or weak" is not a valid !vote rationale. FlipandFlopped 17:18, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As been shown multiple times on the talk page, ITN is not about repeating what's in the news, but featuring quality articles about topics that are in the news. If you want to know what is in the news, you don't use an encyclopedia, you use a newspaper or news website. Masem (t) 20:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As you say, the two requirements are (1) sufficient article quality and (2) it is a topic in the news. If I wanted to see a curated list of what internet users consider the "important" or most "interesting" things in the news, I wouldn't use an encyclopedia, I would open Reddit. This is precisely why subjective assessments of the importance or impact of a given event are irrelevant. FlipandFlopped 04:16, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose they had their annual event, committed to even less than usual and went home again. Doesn't meet WP:ITNSIGNIF as it's one of the least significant COP events in the last few years (last year for example they at least committed to lots of things). Just because some news articles were posted about it (which aren't even at the top of most news sites), this does not mean we should post it. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:45, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's nothing in WP:ITNSIGNIF about whether the subject of an article has long-term consequences. Do you have issues with the length, depth, frequency, or type of sources that are presented for indicating the significance of the event (BBC, Reuters, Al Jazeera, France24)? ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:43, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tehran runs out of water

[edit]

Nominator's comments: the president is thinking of evacuating the entire city of 8 million and building a new capital on the southeast coast, but that is a process that will certainly take years. Yalestonian (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More appropriate linking would be to Tehran water shortage. The text smells a bit botty. Bremps... 08:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • You don't think with all the sources Yalestonian listed above, this nomination already meets WP:ITNSIGNIF? With something as unpredictable as this, I don't think it would be helpful to wait for the situation to develop further. It's impossible to tell what the low-point is, and quickly after we are beyond it the news would become stale. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt blurb - A large megacity with no water is notable. JaxsonR (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeria school kidnapping

[edit]
Article: 2025 Niger State school kidnapping (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Over 300 students are kidnapped in Papiri, Niger State, Nigeria. (Post)
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Major school kidnapping in Nigeria. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 02:25, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The situation in Nigeria is terrible right now. There have been at least four major kidnappings this week. How about we merge the kidnappings into one blurb instead of individually nominating them and potentially overwhelming the ITN box? Bremps... 05:04, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support while kidnappings of school children do seem to be a recurring issue in Nigeria, this is much more extreme in scale. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 22

[edit]

NWSL Championship

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 NWSL Championship (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In association football, Gotham FC defeats the Washington Spirit to win the NWSL Championship (MVP Rose Lavelle pictured). (Post)
News source(s): [1]
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: One of if not the world's leading women's soccer league, major US professional leagueHameltion (talk | contribs) 04:13, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lean Oppose i personally do not believe that NWLS has the sports level of significance for ITN especially given how prevalent soccer is internationally. I would argue domestic leagues for soccer should be only limited to Liga and Premier (including their female variants) only because they have a much larger international following than say MLS or NWLS from what I understand Ion.want.uu (talk) 05:56, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose we already have too much sports slop on ITN/R. Let's not make any more This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 09:57, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Jair Bolsonaro's arrest

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Jair Bolsonaro's arrest (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro (image) preventively arrested by the Federal Police in Brasília. (Post)
News source(s): [2]
Credits:

Article updated
 VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 22:15, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Vitorperrut555: A condenação dele já foi postada antes; além disso, a entrada precisa ser reescrita. ArionStar (talk) 23:31, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • oppose - seems like a very minor event. He tried to escape house arrest and was detained.
Noah, BSBATalk 23:55, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and suggest WP:SNOW close. His conviction was already posted. Comment: God, why does every ITN candidate lately end up being snow-closed? HOPPIO [talk] 10:46, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:GUILLOTINE. Wikipedia's dispute resolution system includes some noticeboards that are relatively unmoderated. Discussions there can become free-for-alls that do more harm than good, with toxic piling-on that escalates instead of solving the dispute. ... Andrew🐉(talk) 12:05, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Orbitalbuzzsaw. ~2025-35698-10 (talk) 13:15, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: JoAnn Persch

[edit]
Article: Pat Murphy and JoAnn Persch (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC7 Chicago
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American religious sister and immigration activist. Died on November 14, but appears death was announced on November 17. ForsythiaJo (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Though, considering it was announced on the 17th, that means we only have today to post this. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 21

[edit]

Auction of Superman #1

[edit]
Article: Superman (comic book) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A copy of the first issue of the Superman comic book series from 1939 sells at auction for $9.12 million, beating the previous record of $3.2 milion for Action Comics 1's sale in 2014. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NYTimes
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: We had posted the previous Action Comics sale, and unlike the recent nomination on an art auction where there were questions as what defined the class of art, this is the record for all comics. Unfortunately we don't have a separate article on that issue itself, but the series article linked is in good shape from a sourcing perspective. Masem (t) 15:59, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose The Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer sale resulted in the creation of a substantial article whereas this is just a small update and the lead of the target article says nothing about the news. The other nomination had a good PD image; this doesn't have an image. The other sale was over $200M whereas this is under $10M. No contest. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose per Andrew🐉(talk)
  • Oppose per Andrew. Moreover, the first issue of the comic had a print run of 200,000 copies, and this is just one of them that sells for a record price, so the buyer doesn't have exclusive ownership of the printed original as there are other copies around the world (probably not 199,999 as some have been lost or destroyed). This would have been way more significant had it been the last surviving copy. In contrast, paintings that sell at auctions are originals, which gives the buyer exclusive ownership, thus making it incomparably less notable than the Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer sale a few days ago.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:14, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is the only known copy in condition 9.0, hence the price. There are other copies, but most have been damaged or destroyed. Even slight damage reduces the grade. (An 8.0 sold for 5.3 million a while back.) The pedigree of this particular comic will make it forever special even if another 9.0 turns up. Superman #1 has a special place in comics history as it was the first comic to feature a single character. Previous comics like Action were anthologies. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:38, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Ornella Vanoni

[edit]
Article: Ornella Vanoni (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): France24
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Italian pop singer. ~2025-35524-89 (talk) 10:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Eli Zeira

[edit]
Article: Eli Zeira (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Times of Israel
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Israeli intelligence officer and director of the Military Intelligence Directorate during the Yom Kippur War. Chomik! (talk?) 01:35, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Miss Universe

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Miss Universe 2025 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Fátima Bosch of Mexico is crowned Miss Universe 2025. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Fátima Bosch of Mexico is crowned Miss Universe 2025, after being referred to as "dumb" by a ceremony official before the event.
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
 Rushtheeditor (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alt blurb is totally irrelevant. _-_Alsor (talk) 21:16, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Second. I personally don't care that one official called the eventual winner dumb. CREditzWiki (yap) | (things i apparently did) 00:02, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd hate to be that person that brings up page view stats, but this event that's not important has more page views than 2025 MotoGP World Championship, which is automatically important. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:24, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't really comparable. This is one of four annual beauty pageants as opposed the the MotoGP World Championship which is the top event in the world. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 00:04, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Of the four, there are only two that may surpass WP:ITNSIGNIF: Universe and World, and I suppose the men here are abhorrent to posting one, much more both. Howard the Duck (talk) 02:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. This event is beating all the current ITN blurbs easily. That's because it's the top read article currently and so there doesn't seem to be much alternative. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:25, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. I guess the altblurb can be nominated for DYK, but otherwise this doesn't seems significant for a blurb. NotKringe (talk) 08:24, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 20

[edit]

RD: Spencer Lofranco

[edit]
Article: Spencer Lofranco (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Deadline The Independent
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Canadian actor best known for his roles in Jamesy Boy, Unbroken, and GottiItsShandog (talk) 20:42, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not ready filmography is unsourced as are a few sentences (homeless on the beach with the nickname "Fire", for instance) 1brianm7 (talk) 05:32, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have added citations to filmography section and that sentence you mentioned must of been removed as I don't see it anymore. ItsShandog (talk) 09:14, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice work, article is in a better, fully cited, state. 1brianm7 (talk) 19:36, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Tongan general election

[edit]
Article: 2025 Tongan general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Ten members of the Legislative Assembly of Tonga retain their seats in the general election. (Post)
News source(s): Matangi Tonga
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 ArionStar (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been substantially updated, but agree with wait votes regarding blurbing once a prime minister is selected. The Kip (contribs) 02:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait - The party affiliations of the winning candidates are yet to be released. If it does turn out that all winners are independents (which seems likely), then the usual course is to post which individual is elected prime minister (which parliament will vote on). This is how the last election in Tuvalu and the 2022 Nauruan parliamentary election were posted (although in Nauru's case it was the president). The Tongan parliament may not hold a vote for PM for a little while (it did not occur for almost a month after the previous election). If that does eventuate, then this nomination would need to be withdrawn and then could be renominated after the PM is elected — N Panama 84534 🏝️🥥 20:29, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait for the results as per above. Apart from that, the article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:11, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wait per above. Per Chorchapu, I suggest changing the blurb once the results are out. HOPPIO [talk] 12:38, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@~2025-35132-06, @Andrew Davidson, @The Kip, @N Panama 84534, @MtPenguinMonster, @Dmartin969, @Orbitalbuzzsaw, @Chorchapu, @Hoppiovonhoppio: the results are out. Any alt blurb proposal? ArionStar (talk) 20:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest waiting until a prime minister is elected (which will probably not be for few a weeks), as is usually done for elections where all candidates are independents. Probably best to withdraw this nomination and renominate once this has occurred. — N Panama 84534 🏝️🥥 20:27, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gary "Mani" Mounfield

[edit]
Article: Mani (musician) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Basist with The Stone Roses and Primal Scream Ceoil (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 19

[edit]

Nexperia

[edit]
Article: Nexperia (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Netherlands suspends its takeover of Chinese-owned Nexperia. (Post)
News source(s): [3]
Credits:

 Pretty big news in the econ front of having the state-takeover of a company reversed due to pressure.Psephguru (talk) 09:34, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose for now. This is a huge domestic news story here, so I can definitely imagine a feature based on it. However, the article has only been updated with a single sentence, and I have a hard time gauging what "suspended control" even really means. What has changed? Much more prose is necessary here. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:23, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Chinese owned resumed ownership in running the company.Psephguru (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A single-sentence news update doesn't really warrant featuring on the Wikipedia frontpage. We want that, when readers click on the article, they learn more about the subject. The entire incident is just a single paragraph. It gives some good context, but it doesn't feel like the level we should look for for frontpage features. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 12:38, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs work to explain what's going on. This used to be part of the big Dutch conglomerate, Philips. It makes chips and is an essential supplier of them to the auto industry. It has now become part of the US/China trade war and Chinese pushback is disrupting the auto industry. To coin a phrase, "Everything's Computer!". Andrew🐉(talk) 13:09, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Roza Jalilova

[edit]
Article: Roza Jalilova (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): apa
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Azerbaijani dancer. Article is long enough and fully sourced. QuicoleJR (talk) 04:15, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Corruption in Ukraine

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Operation Midas (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Ukrainian parliament votes to dismiss Minister of Justice German Galushchenko and Minister of Energy Svitlana Hrynchuk amid wartime corruption scandal investigated by the Operation Midas. (Post)
News source(s): The Kyiv Independent, Reuters
Article needs updating
 UCinternational (talk) 11:47, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – This article feels like the platonic ideal of an ITN feature. I can see a lot of work has been put into it in the past week. I would like to see the [failed verification] in the lede cleaned up first, but otherwise it looks good. I expect a lot of !votes related to whether this is already covered by our existing Ongoing articles, but it looks like Midas is not mentioned in either article currently, so it's not covered. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 12:03, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It's in the news but my concern is whether we should be highlighting this in particular when there's so much corruption elsewhere. :For example:
  1. Milan’s real estate corruption probe in doubt
  2. Police raid Portugal's TAP airline in corruption probe
  3. Albania is fighting corruption. The accused are fighting back
  4. Man who testified in Histadrut corruption probe dies by suicide
  5. A year of Serbian anti-Corruption Protests
  6. Top PLA heads have rolled but China’s hunt for corrupt military officials may be here to stay
These are all fairly fresh stories that one finds when searching for "corruption" but I'm not sufficiently familiar with the details to evaluate their comparative merits.
Andrew🐉(talk) 15:17, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose We should wait until there us a court case and decision on guilt, rather than intermediate actions, in the cases of govt corruption. BLPCRIME concerns and all that in addition to typical ITN caution to wait for such verdicts. Masem (t) 15:21, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose/Wait for conviction per WP:BLPCRIME. ~2025-34764-67 (talk) 17:28, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support now There is no need to wait, the story is that they have been dismissed from their ministerial postions, and the reasons given are due that this is due to Midas, so where is the BLP violation? Whether fairly or not is another matter but there's no inferrence of crime here, just pure statement of fact. We rarely have a corruption story with a definite "blurbworthy" moment which can be nailed on to a specific time and place, and if we wait, then what usually happens in corruption cases, there will be appeals, counter-suits, political maneuvering, blame-shifting and all sorts of judicial wrangling before it all fizzles out with either one or two scapegoats or with blame completely dissipated over time. Abcmaxx (talk) 17:39, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Major political scandal in the Ukraine, developing just now.Wi1-ch (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    A developing political scandal is very much not appropriate for ITN, unless it was the arrest of the sitting national leader. Masem (t) 19:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to be that guy, but we're putting cabinet members being removed from office into ITN now? Howard the Duck (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose An anti-corruption investigation revealing corruption in one of the most corrupt countries in the world isn't really major news, and the removal from office of the two ministers involved isn't a significant change in the country's politics. Unless this story further results in mass convictions of high-profile political figures or Zelenskyy is held accountable and removed from office because he appointed the two corrupt ministers, this seems like a staged scandal to please the EU politicians that Ukraine is fighting corruption.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeCorruption in Ukraine is common enough for this particular story to not be posted to ITN. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 20:45, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Gustav Klimt's Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer (pictured) sells at auction for US$236.4 million, making it the most expensive piece of modern art in history. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Gustav Klimt's Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer (pictured) sells for US$236.4 million, making it the second most valuable artwork ever sold at auction.
News source(s): ABC, BBC, CNN, NBC, Guardian, NYT
Credits:
 Golem08 (talk) 02:39, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
oppose not a record, so not notable. just like every female or LGBT head of govt is not going to be posted for that reason these days.Psephguru (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 18

[edit]

(Closed) Epstein files votes

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Epstein Files Transparency Act (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the United States, the House of Representatives and the Senate vote nearly unanimously to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which would release the Epstein files. (Post)
News source(s): NBC - HoP, CNN - S
Credits:
   Jalapeño   (u t g) 19:51, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: André Chandernagor

[edit]
Article: André Chandernagor (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Le Monde
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: French politican who served in various influential positions. Article is fully sourced and adequate in length. --The Robot Parade 19:50, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 World Shooting Championship

[edit]
Article: 2025 ISSF World Shooting Championships (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ China wins the 2025 World Shooting Championships in Cairo, Egypt, with 21 medals. (Post)
News source(s): [Xinhua], [People's Daily]
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Woefully undersourced, but the world championships in shooting Chorchapu (talk | edits) 19:40, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decriminalization of sodomy in the military and police justice of the Dominican Republic

[edit]
Article: LGBT rights in the Dominican Republic (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Constitutional Court of the Dominican Republic rules that the criminalization of sodomy in both military and police justice is unconstitutional. (Post)
News source(s): [4]
Credits:

Article needs updating

 Nika de Hitch (talk) 19:30, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Randy Jones

[edit]
Article: Randy Jones (baseball) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The San Diego Union-Tribune
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American baseball player, former Cy Young Award winner. —Bagumba (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Randy Burke

[edit]
Article: Randy Burke (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WKYT
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American football wide receiver for the Baltimore Colts. Article is somewhat short but long enough and fully sourced. --The Robot Parade 05:18, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Singapore qualifies for the 2027 AFC Asian Cup

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2027 AFC Asian Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ For the first time, the Singapore national football team have qualified for the Asian Cup on merit. (Post)
News source(s): CNA, SCMP
Credits:
Actually, Curaçao and Haiti have just qualified. That's pretty special. HiLo48 (talk) 06:30, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 17

[edit]

(Closed) Gaza peace plan endorsed by the United Nations Security Council

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: United Nations Security Council Resolution 2803 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Gaza peace plan has been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The United Nations Security Council passes a resolution to endorse the Gaza peace plan.
News source(s): [5]
Article updated
 Wi1-ch (talk) 16:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The NYT analysis says that "And Hamas has made clear it will not make things easy. The group rejected the U.N. resolution, saying on Tuesday that involving the International Stabilization Force in disarming it would turn the force into “a party to the conflict on behalf of” Israel." If Hamas doesn't agree with the resolution then it seems dead before it has started. Turning this round will mean more action on the ground and further negotiation and that's what we have Ongoing for. Note that the target article's lead doesn't explain that Hamas is dissenting from this Resolution and so gives a misleading impression that everything is on track. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a classic case of "covered by the ongoing". This is not that much of a significant development. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 17:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Covered by ongoing. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2025 Medina bus crash

[edit]
Article: 2025 Medina bus crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A bus carrying Umrah pilgrims to Mecca collides with a tanker in Medina, Saudi Arabia, killing at least 45 people. (Post)
News source(s): NYT The Hindu Al Jazeera CBC O Globo
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Working on it. ArionStar (talk) 03:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Withholding judgement until the article is more complete, but haven't these incidents involving pilgrims become relatively routine? I feel like I see at least one a year.–DMartin 03:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Rebecca Heineman

[edit]
Article: Rebecca Heineman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): PC Gamer
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American game developer and LGBT activist. Article needs more sources, especially for games she worked on, but improvements are ongoing. MidnightMayhem (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted RD) RD/blurb: Kessler Twins

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Kessler Twins (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  The Kessler Twins (pictured), who were a famous double-act, choose to die together on the same day. (Post)
News source(s): CNN, EuroNews, Times of India, The Times, Die Zeit
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Famous German singers, dancers and actresses. Grimes2 17:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose blurb. RD is sufficient. Natg 19 (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD, oppose blurb article appears good to post. Blurb absolutely not necessary, no indication of how they were a major figure, and while it's an unusual case of choosing to use assisted suicide to die at the same time, that is completely legal in Germany and not uncommon itself. That factoid is better for DYK than as a blurb Masem (t) 22:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That's all wrong.
    1. This is mainly a case of "death-is-the-story", not "major figure", though they do seem quite famous too.
    2. Such duo-suicide is quite rare -- see BBC report on another case, for example, which explicitly says "it’s rare".
    3. Assisted suicide is fairly new to Germany, dating from a court ruling in 2020, and the overall numbers are still fairly low there. And most countries don't have it at all, of course.
    4. As usual, the article doesn't qualify for DYK as the article was created in 2006 which shows how notable they were.
    Andrew🐉(talk) 21:58, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD, oppose blurb - This is obviously not a suitable nomination for a blurb, and Andrew has made so many such nominations recently that it's getting to be disruptive even apart from everything else about how he uses ITNC. GenevieveDEon (talk) 22:16, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support RD, oppose blurb as per above. RD is sufficient. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:25, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support RD, oppose blurb As per reasons above TheFellaVB (talk) 02:18, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question This is a very unusual nomination, as articles about duos where neither of the two are independently notable enough to have their own page are already very few in number, and then it is even more rare for both members of such a duo to die in conjunction with each other and on the same date. With this said, I am wondering whether it would be more respectful or in keeping with the obituary-esque nature of the RD section to include them as Alice Kessler and Ellen Kessler as opposed to "Kessler twins". They were individual human beings who lived their own lives, after all. FlipandFlopped 03:51, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • To some extent I agree, but I think there's a reason they decided to go out together. They were clearly a duo in almost every aspect of life. I wouldn't consider it disrespectful when it seems like that may be exactly how they want to be remembered. ----The Robot Parade 05:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WHy not a compromise like "Alice and Ellen Kessler" for RD. The German Wikipedia did it the same way. --Clibenfoart (talk) 09:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That seems like a perfectly reasonable approach. GenevieveDEon (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Re-posted) Hasina conviction

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Trial of Sheikh Hasina (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: In Bangladesh, the International Crimes Tribunal rules that former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina (pictured) is found guilty of crimes against humanity and sentenced to death. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Bangladeshi International Crimes Tribunal convicts former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina (pictured) of crimes against humanity and sentences her to death.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Former Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina (pictured) is found guilty of crimes against humanity and sentenced to death in absentia.
News source(s): DT ABC
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Started reading the verdict, so imminent on the judgement. It is notable though. Psephguru (talk) 08:32, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - At the time of writing this comment, the blurb ends "rules that former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina is." She does presumably exist, but could we not put nominations up until we know what the story is, please? GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:34, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The reading is currently under way already Guilty already. Dunno the punishedment, but this is notable itself.Psephguru (talk) 08:37, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Could you not have waited 10 minutes, and put up a complete nomination first time? No-one is going to reward you, or any of us, for rushing. GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:44, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have no doubt that she indeed is.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 13:17, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Altblurb added.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 08:55, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The International Crimes Tribunal is a terribly misleading name given it's a Bangladeshi court; let's shorten it to ICT maybe or add the description "Bangladesh's" before it? Abcmaxx (talk) 09:10, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, for the altblurb.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 09:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with altblurb. Also to wait a little, because fixed sourced will come soon, but I am updating it with what is in.Psephguru (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on quality and notability with altblurb There will probably much more to come given the gravity of the verdict but as it stands the article is comprehensive, easy to read and sourced. Abcmaxx (talk) 09:47, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The death penalty of a former prime minister is notable, and the target article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 09:50, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support/altblurb/comment Added another alt, don't believe the court name is neccessary (not really a known body internationally). The other blurbs fail to say that it was in absentia, which is a big deal. Happy to change them if needed, but thought it best the users who wrote them add it if needed.Basetornado (talk) 09:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The tribunal is a domestic one not an international body and was set up for the civil war which resulted in the creation of Bangladesh but it's now being used for a political show trial of an opposition leader. The death penalty is not happening because she is in exile in India, who is not going to be giving her up, right? Andrew🐉(talk) 10:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those are all good reasons to post. Abductive (reasoning) 10:58, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Her authoritarian rule caused thousands of deaths and tens of thousands injuries, including in one of the bloodiest crackdowns in recent history, not to mention the decades-long systematic persecution of political rivals with extrajudicial killings and abductions. Whatever Bangladesh's governance and judicial deficiencies, or stance on capital punishment, calling it a show trial effectively calling it a kangaroo court is a massively biased and partisan stance. Abcmaxx (talk) 11:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is just the way politics is done now in South Asia. Over in West Pakistan, the military regime is repressing the opposition but we're not posting about crimes against humanity there; instead the blurb is of a grand constitutional amendment to give them legal immunity from such considerations. Obviously these legal systems are quite partisan, serving the interests of whoever happens to be in power. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since ITN is objective and not a blog or all the commentary on twitter last few hours.Psephguru (talk) 11:56, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:ITNSIGNIF, ITN is actually "highly subjective" and it shows. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:03, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Two things can be true at once though, just because the Bangladeshi judicial process isn't great that doesn't automatically mean she was held responsible for atrocious crimes without reason. Also you would be hard-pressed to find any non-contentious sentencing of a high-ranking official even functioning democracies: was Sarkozy's sentence too lenient? Was Bolsonaro's too harsh? What about Assad fleeing to Moscow and being tried in absentia? Netenyahu's and Putin's Hague arrest warrants? What about even a relatively low-ranking Marcin Romanowski being granted asylum by Orban to avoid bring tried for some pretty brazen theft of public funds in Poland claiming the Polish now government and former opposition is out to get him? These are things all happening even in well-established non-authoritarian democratic countries. Few would question Hasina's culpability, and even fewer leaders of such stature are held to account by any court. Abcmaxx (talk) 12:37, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You claim that these things are rare but my impression is that they are common and you list a bunch of recent examples. What matters is who holds power and we already posted details of her being deposed and fleeing. This show trial is just a coda and formality. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:07, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly disagree, trials and judicial processes are important. We posted both ICC arrest warrants, Bolsonaro's conviction and a bit further back Frank Bainimarama's incarceration. Even with those precedents, none of these were convictions for crimes against humanity, that is the most of serious of charges one can face, on top of that there's a capital punishment element. Abcmaxx (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wish to draw attention to Andrew's use of 'West Pakistan' here, because that would appear to carry the anachronistic and arguably inflammatory implication that Bangladesh, which is what the rest of us are discussing, is still 'East Pakistan'. GenevieveDEon (talk) 22:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ALT1 - Head of government fleeing the country and being sentenced to death is extraordinary. All passages are cited from a quick look. Also, Oppose original blurb as misleading. Hugoaway (talk) 11:32, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, i comment above in support of alt1.Psephguru (talk) 11:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Suppport ALT2 looks notable, ALT2 feels best, would be fine with ALT1, not ALT0 1brianm7 (talk) 11:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Original has already been renounced, but can't take it down as empty then.Psephguru (talk) 12:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Striked it. In the future, just put <s> and </s> between your blurb if you want to renounce your own blurb.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 12:33, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support either blurb, with a preference for Alt 2. This is big news, and as previously discussed, we seem to have a broad consensus that convictions are the thing to post. Psephguru, thank you for being willing to listen; Jalapeño, thank you for helping, and for striking out the unwanted blurb rather the messing up the numbers by deleting it. GenevieveDEon (talk) 12:37, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.Psephguru (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 2 Good article to nominate, and this ruling has a higher standard than just “a biased partisan ruling” SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 15:51, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 2 more neutral wording, notable article to nominate. Ahammed Saad (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it has been pulled, as there is discussion over BLPCRIME at WP:ERRORS. Natg 19 (talk) 23:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the blurb goes back up, it needs to be contextualised that a Bangladeshi court made the finding. Also the article itself needs correcting. At present in the first para a sentence reads "Hasina and Kamal were convicted on 17 November 2025 of crimes against humanity by the International Crimes Tribunal-I and sentenced to death, while Mamun was also found guilty but sentenced to five years in prison as he had turned into a state witness." Any reader could easily confuse The "International Crimes Tribunal-I" with being an actual international criminal tribunal, which it is not. TarnishedPathtalk 23:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
also, "Kamal" should be "Khan", right? ~2025-35353-50 (talk) 14:31, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re-posted. Per broad consensus at WP:ERRORS, on top of the original consensus above, I've reverted my earlier pull and reinstated the hook. However, per a sensible observation by GreenLipstickLesbian, the simple addition that it was by a Bangladeshi court doesn't really harm the neutrality and may assuage some of the concerns raised by TarnishedPath. I've also made the nationality of the court clear in the article lead. My pull-and-then-repost action has effectively resulted in the status quo being restored, so if for any reason there's later a consensus that a further pull is required, that would be a fresh action and not subject to WP:WHEEL concerns.  — Amakuru (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: